Based on Enterno.io Email Checker Q1 2026 (50K domain sample): SPF configured on 78% of domains, DKIM — 62%, DMARC — only 34% (and only 12% of those on p=reject). Top errors: SPF with +all (8%), DKIM without key rotation (>2 years — 45%), DMARC at p=none as permanent (94% of those who set it).
Analysis via Enterno.io Email Checker for Q1 2026: 50,000 domains (.ru, .рф + RU-hosted). Checked: SPF syntax, DKIM selectors + key size, DMARC policy and tag coverage, blacklist listing (Spamhaus/Barracuda/SORBS), open-relay on 25/587.
| Protocol | Coverage | Correct setup |
|---|---|---|
| SPF | 78% | 92% without +all |
| DKIM | 62% | 55% with key ≥ 2048 bit |
| DMARC | 34% | 12% on p=reject |
DMARC remains the most underused — without it SPF+DKIM do not fully protect from spoofing. And p=none is "reports only", not protection.
~all or -all.From 50K domains: 4.2% listed in Spamhaus SBL/XBL, 2.1% in Barracuda BRBL, 1.3% in SORBS. Most common listing reason — compromised hosting account (60%), followed by legitimate marketing emails from domains without SPF (25%).
Check a domain against blacklists online — /en/email-check.
~all (not +all).Proper SPF, DKIM, and DMARC configuration directly impacts email deliverability. Without these records, your emails land in spam or are rejected before delivery.
SPF record correctness: syntax, allowed server list, fail mechanism.
Presence and validity of DKIM signature for the specified selector.
DMARC record parsing: policy, rua/ruf reports, SPF and DKIM alignment.
Numerical delivery readiness score with improvement recommendations.
mailing list verification
registration validation
CRM contact check
mail delivery troubleshooting
?all means "neutral" — that's not protection. Use -all.p=none only collects reports. Move to p=quarantine or p=reject.rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com — receive weekly aggregate reports.Email check history and API keys for service integration.
Sign up freeQ1 2026. Updated quarterly.
Yes, with attribution to Enterno.io.