Skip to content

HTTP Status Code Distribution in Runet 2026

TL;DR:

Analysis of HTTP responses from Runet sites Q1 2026 (Enterno.io HTTP checker): 87% return 200 OK on root, 8% — 301/302 redirects, 3% — 404, less than 1% — 5xx. Top issue: 14% of sites have redirect chains of 3+ hops (consumes Google crawl budget).

Methodology

Checked ~50,000 unique domains in .ru, .рф + RU-hosted sites on international TLDs during Q1 2026. Each site queried via HTTP checker — root URL + 3 random paths.

Distribution by class

Class%Status
2xx (success)87%
3xx (redirect)8%ℹ️ mostly 301
4xx (client error)4%⚠️ 75% of these are 404
5xx (server error)< 1%🔴 critical

Top-5 most common 4xx

  1. 404 Not Found — 75% of all 4xx. Usually broken links to deleted pages without 301 redirects.
  2. 403 Forbidden — 12%. Cloudflare DDoS protection, WAF rules, wrong permissions.
  3. 400 Bad Request — 6%. Most often invalid Host header or malformed URL.
  4. 429 Too Many Requests — 4%. Rate-limiting at hosting / CDN.
  5. 451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons — 2%. Roskomnadzor blocks (for EU IPs).

Redirect chains — hidden problem

14% of sites have 3+ redirect chains on the root URL. Typical example: http://example.com → https://example.com → https://www.example.com → https://www.example.com/. Each hop adds 150-300 ms latency and consumes crawl budget. Correct: redirect straight to the canonical URL with a single 301.

Check chain length via /en/redirects.

Recommendations

  1. Monitor 4xx via Broken Links Checker — crawl site monthly.
  2. Reduce redirect chains to 1 hop.
  3. Configure a custom 404 page with search + links to popular sections.
  4. Never return 200 for "soft 404" — misleads Google and keeps dead pages indexed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is data current?

Q1 2026. Updated quarterly.

Can I cite this?

Yes, with attribution to Enterno.io.